Chronobiology and chrononutrition
This page brings together scientific sources and reference guidelines on Chronobiology and chrononutrition, and explains how Cibus AI can support nutrition professionals in daily practice.
Scientific sources and reference guidelines
A selection of scientific references and guidelines on Chronobiology and chrononutrition. The list is not exhaustive and may be updated over time.
- Literature on circadian rhythms and time-restricted eating
- SRBR – Society for Research on Biological Rhythms
- ESRS – European Sleep Research Society
- Cell Metabolism – time-restricted eating (Panda)
- Chrono-nutrition Working Group (ISNS) — International chrononutrition group; recommendations on meal timing and circadian rhythms in metabolic prevention.
- Hatori et al., Cell Metabolism (2012) — PMID 22608008 — Mouse study: an 8-hour feeding window protected against metabolic changes without reducing calories; preclinical evidence.
- Gill & Panda, Cell Metabolism (2015) — PMID 26411343 — Pilot app-based study of human meal timing; it describes eating patterns and does not alone prove clinical benefits of TRE.
- Sutton et al., Cell Metabolism (2018) — PMID 29754952 — Five-week controlled crossover in 8 men with prediabetes: some markers improved without weight loss; the sample was very small.
- Lowe et al., TREAT trial (2020) — PMID 32986097 — 12-week randomized trial: the 16:8 protocol did not produce significantly greater weight loss than consistent meal timing.
- Liu et al., New England Journal of Medicine (2022) — PMID 35443107 — 12-month trial: adding an 8-hour TRE window to calorie restriction did not significantly improve weight loss versus calorie restriction alone.
- Wilkinson et al., Cell Metabolism (2020) — PMID 31813824 — Single-arm pilot in 19 people with metabolic syndrome; promising signals, but no control group to attribute effects to TRE.
The listed sources represent the main references on which Cibus AI is trained and updated. The list is constantly evolving and is not exhaustive. Cibus AI is a support tool and does not replace clinical, professional or ethical judgment: every decision remains the full and exclusive responsibility of the professional.
Frequently asked questions
What does the evidence say about Chronobiology and chrononutrition?
This page summarizes selected studies and guidelines on Chronobiology and chrononutrition. Evidence types and certainty vary; no single source proves effectiveness for every population or clinical situation.
Which sources does Cibus AI rely on for Chronobiology and chrononutrition?
Cibus AI relies on clinical guidelines, international standards and reference scientific literature for Chronobiology and chrononutrition, listed on this page and continuously updated.
Does Cibus AI replace clinical judgment?
No. Cibus AI is a support tool: every decision remains the full and exclusive responsibility of the professional.
Spend more time with patients, less on paperwork
Discover how Cibus AI supports your nutrition practice. Try the free demo.
Try Cibus for free